tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27941757.post4153443481588927169..comments2008-12-20T14:25:12.941-08:00Ryanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11055041746535946952noreply@blogger.comBlogger2125tag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27941757.post-29962375807690526822008-12-20T14:25:00.000-08:002008-12-20T14:25:00.000-08:00Good point autiomaa. I agree -- folders within folders would make this a non-issue, and would be the superior solution. But until then I'd settle for long folder names, an easier change for them to make.<BR/><BR/>At the moment I have 799 feeds subscribed. So yes this feature would help me too!<BR/><BR/>This version also is still bad at reprinting the same (old) item over and over for certain feeds. Whenever certain feeds updates, Google Reader thinks everything in it is new, for some reason.Ryanhttp://www.blogger.com/profile/11055041746535946952noreply@blogger.comtag:blogger.com,1999:blog-27941757.post-61449751353731558752008-12-05T06:33:00.000-08:002008-12-05T06:33:00.000-08:00There should be option to have folders inside of folders to make management of feeds more reasonable than what it is now. When having large amount of feeds navigation between them gets problematic since there is often not clear enough way to arrange them. At the moment I have 245 different RSS feeds in Google Reader and would really like improvements to that part of user interface.<BR/><BR/>Anyways, new version feels little bit faster than previous one.autiomaahttp://autiomaa.org/noreply@blogger.com